[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] lockdep: spin_lock_nest_lock()
 > No more than 48 locks (mutexes, rwlocks, spinlock, RCU, everything
> covered by lockdep) held by any one code-path; including nested
> interrupt contexts.

Does that mean that something like the new mm_take_all_locks() operation
is going to explode if someone tries to use it with lockdep on?

- R.

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-04 16:29    [W:0.074 / U:39.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site