Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:30:26 +0900 (JST) | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] ne.c msleep not mdelay | From | Atsushi Nemoto <> |
| |
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:44:47 +0100, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: > > So, if rescheduling was dangerous here, we already have potential > > problems, no? > > Yes we do but I didn't manage to stop the other mistakes getting in when > they did. If you take a schedule you get results back from the probe_irq > that tend to suck in other random ISA device events (ISA being edge > triggered nobody was ever careful about spurious irq)
OK, I see your point. Thanks.
--- Atsushi Nemoto
| |