[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Introduce down_try() so we can move away from down_trylock()
On Monday 04 August 2008 03:35:41 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Aug 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Anyway, I NAK'ed your patches. Deal with it.
> Btw, "dealing with it" can just be "don't bother".

Yes, let's not make a mountain out of a molehill.

Someone sent me a patch documenting the illogic of down_trylock(). I decided
to try to fix it rather than just bitch and moan.

Kernel coding involves occasionally getting fed a Linus-special shit sandwich
rant. I've long given up expecting a polite "No; please just replace them
all with mutexes" one-liner. I might have actually been shocked into doing

Consider the patches forgotten,

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-04 05:39    [W:0.058 / U:4.556 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site