[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] resource/x86: add sticky resource type

* Linus Torvalds <> wrote:

> The fact is, the only reliable way to handle these things has _always_
> been to ask the hardware first. Add the broken resources from ACPI and
> other BIOS tables _later_. If they conflict, it is the ACPI/BIOS
> tables that should be removed.

i fully agree with that principle, i just messed up implementing it.

'Sticky resources' tried to be exactly the kind of 'untrusted, possibly
wrong' resources, which should not prevent existing PCI resources from
being registered - they would at most prevent new PCI resources from
being allocated over them. (the free space is large enough for us to
take the small/untrusted hint from the BIOS where not to allocate to)

I missed the possibility of a sticky resource not being wide enough and
preventing a BAR from being registered, due to partial overlap. That was
not intended.

I guess this whole patchset has to become a lot wider and a lot more


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-28 22:21    [W:0.051 / U:27.728 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site