[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2][MTD] Add support for > 2GiB MTD devices
On Wed, 27 August 2008 17:47:43 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> The plus of sysfs I see is that I can add more files to expose more
> information in sysfs, while I can not change MEMGETINFO ioctl. E.g., I
> need to expose sub-page size to user-space, and I cannot do this with

sysfs makes adding new attributes easier, yes. But once added you
cannot remove the attribute again - ever. Which means that either way
you need to tread carefully and think twice before making a rash

> > So what was the reason again why mtd needs two userspace interfaces
> > instead of just one?
> I would like to make udev creating MTD devices, instead of creating them
> by hands. Adding MTD to LDM would anyway introduce corresponding sysfs
> files, right? This means we would have one more interface anyway.

Could be useful, I don't mind you sending a patch. However, does this
means that MEMGETINFO64 or some other ioctl should not be done? Should
flash_erase open, read and close 8 seperate files instead of doing a
single ioctl? And should our support for large devices wait for the
sysfs support that has been talked about and not done for about two
years already?

Call me a sceptic.


The cheapest, fastest and most reliable components of a computer
system are those that aren't there.
-- Gordon Bell, DEC labratories
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-27 17:29    [W:0.108 / U:0.860 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site