[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] cgroup(fix critical bug): new handling for tasks file
    Paul Menage wrote:
    > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Lai Jiangshan <> wrote:
    >> It's complicated than necessary and change too much code IMO.
    > What about the problem that maintaining a single pid array can still
    > fail for a really large cgroup? I guess we could just say "don't
    > create such large cgroups" but someone's bound to want to do that.
    > Perhaps use an array of pages rather than a single large kmalloc?

    Actually, I had a plan to write such a patch:
    [RFC PATCH] cgroup,cpuset: use alternative malloc instead of kmalloc

    The main idea is: when allocate size >= PAGE_SIZE, vmalloc will be used
    instead. This will reduce the stress when continuous pages are few.
    Alternative malloc is used for cgroup_tasks_open() and update_tasks_nodemask().

    And vmalloc can malloc larger memory than kmalloc, is vmalloc() enough?
    If not, I think using an array of pages is the best choice.

    [There are several subsystem who use alternative malloc. kernel/relay.c
    for example. relay.c is also using an array of pages for relay buffer. ]


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-08-27 06:35    [W:0.021 / U:9.312 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site