[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] smp_call_function: use rwlocks on queues rather than rcu
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> If we combine these two cases, and flip the counter as soon as we've
> enqueued one callback, unless we're already waiting for a grace period
> to end - which gives us a longer window to collect callbacks.
> And then the rcu_read_unlock() can do:
> if (dec_and_zero(my_counter) && my_index == dying)
> raise_softirq(RCU)
> to fire off the callback stuff.
> /me ponders - there must be something wrong with that...
> Aaah, yes, the dec_and_zero is non trivial due to the fact that its a
> distributed counter. Bugger..

Then lets make it per cpu. If we get the cpu ops in then dec_and_zero would be
very cheap.

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-25 17:51    [W:0.094 / U:0.920 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site