[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] smp_call_function: use rwlocks on queues rather than rcu
Paul E. McKenney wrote:

>>> So on your these large boxes, read-only cachelines are preferentially
>>> ejected from the cache, so that one should write to per-CPU data
>>> occasionally to keep it resident? Or is the issue the long RCU grace
>>> periods which allow the structure being freed to age out of all relevant
>>> caches? (My guess would be the second.)
>> The issue are the RCU grace period that are generally long enough to make the
>> cacheline fall out of all caches.
> Would it make sense to push the freed-by-RCU memory further up the
> hierarchy, so that such memory is not mistaken for recently freed
> hot-in-cache memory?

That would mean passing a gfp flag like __GFP_COLD on free from RCU? Or how
would that work at the higher levels?

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-22 20:41    [W:0.077 / U:21.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site