lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC v2][PATCH 4/9] Memory management - dump state
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Oren Laadan <orenl@cs.columbia.edu> wrote:
>
>> checkpoint/ckpt_x86.c | 28 ++++
>> checkpoint/rstr_x86.c | 2 +
>
> please move these into arch/x86/mm/checkpoint.c and
> arch/x86/mm/restore.c. (also, please dont try to abbreviate too much in
> filenames, makes it harder to follow changes later on, etc.)
>
> Cool stuff btw! Any ETA on when more complex apps can be
> checkpointed/restored? Also, shouldnt at least part of this effort be
> joined with the live migration efforts of openvz? (or do you see
> fundamental, unsolvable differences?)

My understanding is that this is a result of the joint discussion (with the
OpenVZ folks present) that happened during the containers min-summit prior to
OLS this year.

--
Balbir


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-21 12:31    [W:0.090 / U:0.468 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site