[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [malware-list] scanner interface proposal was: [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scanning
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Eric Paris wrote:

> On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 17:15 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>>> read -> we have the ALLOW/mark result bit in core set so just allow.
>> Don't think we need this - SELinux can do that bit
>>> mtime update -> clear ALLOW/"mark result" bit in core, send async
>>> notification to userspace
>> Why via the kernel ?
> the single in core allow/deny bit is so that the vast majority of
> operations are completely free. Say we scan/index /lib/
> once. Do you really want every single read/mmap operation from then on
> to have to block waiting for the userspace caches of you HSM, your AV
> scanner, and you indexer? If all three tell the kernel they don't need
> to see it again and that information is easy and free to maintain, lets
> do it.

this is why the proposal caches the results of all the scanners with the
file (in the xattrs), rather then having each scanner store it's own scan

David Lang

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-18 19:41    [W:0.074 / U:3.392 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site