[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: CPU load after killing iwlagn with RF kill switch
    On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 07:20:54PM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
    > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 6:02 PM, John W. Linville
    > <> wrote:
    > > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 10:04:12AM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
    > >
    > >> There is gap in current rfkill implementation that we didn't close
    > >> yet. There were also few patches that were not signed by Intel and
    > >> are apparently wrong.
    > >
    > > Can you be more specific? Do you know which patches are wrong (even
    > > if you don't know how to fix them)?
    > >
    > 80fcc9e28cf3a209fbfb39a7bbddc313c59c7424
    > This one is wrong and there are more then are not acked even though
    > they cause no problem. In general I would prefer that patches will be
    > acked by Yi or me.

    And in general, they are. In general I would prefer if you would
    work upstream instead of working in iwlwifi-2.6 and periodically
    dumping a dozen or more patches on me all at once. C'est la vie...

    > I will try to rebase our rfkill fixes ASAP from iwlwifi-2.6. iwl5000 branch.


    John W. Linville

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-08-17 19:35    [W:0.021 / U:222.760 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site