[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: CPU load after killing iwlagn with RF kill switch
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 07:20:54PM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 6:02 PM, John W. Linville
> <> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 10:04:12AM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> >
> >> There is gap in current rfkill implementation that we didn't close
> >> yet. There were also few patches that were not signed by Intel and
> >> are apparently wrong.
> >
> > Can you be more specific? Do you know which patches are wrong (even
> > if you don't know how to fix them)?
> >
> 80fcc9e28cf3a209fbfb39a7bbddc313c59c7424
> This one is wrong and there are more then are not acked even though
> they cause no problem. In general I would prefer that patches will be
> acked by Yi or me.

And in general, they are. In general I would prefer if you would
work upstream instead of working in iwlwifi-2.6 and periodically
dumping a dozen or more patches on me all at once. C'est la vie...

> I will try to rebase our rfkill fixes ASAP from iwlwifi-2.6. iwl5000 branch.


John W. Linville

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-17 19:35    [W:0.064 / U:3.220 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site