Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface | From | Kenneth Goldman <> | Date | Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:50:01 -0400 |
| |
"Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com> wrote on 08/15/2008 06:37:27 AM:
> Remember even soldered on stuff can fail. How linux handles the > death of the TPM module needs to be covered.
Is fault tolerance a requirement just for the TPM, or is it a general> Linux requirement? Has it always been there, or is it new?
For example, does kernel software have to gracefully handle failures in the disk controller, processor, memory controller, BIOS flash memory, etc?
I'd think it would be quite hard to code around motherboard failures in a commodity platform not designed for fault tolerance.
| |