lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: No, really, stop trying to delete slab until you've finished making slub perform as well
    Pekka Enberg wrote:
    >
    > This patch hard locks on my 2-way 64-bit x86 machine (sysrq doesn't
    > respond) when I run hackbench.
    At that point we take the listlock and then the slab lock which is a
    lock inversion if we do not use a trylock here. Crap.

    Hmmm.. The code already goes to the next slab if an earlier one is
    already locked. So I do not see how the large partial lists could be
    generated.




    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-08-14 17:11    [W:2.900 / U:0.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site