[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] add phys_addr_t for holding physical addresses
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Are we sure resource_size_t is -never- used to represent memory ? I
> though it was on some platforms....

On x86 it's optionally used to put memory in the resource tree, but if
the memory is larger than can be held in resource_size_t it simply skips
it. Don't know about elsewhere.


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-12 00:53    [W:0.052 / U:7.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site