Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:50:21 -0700 | From | Jeremy Fitzhardinge <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] add phys_addr_t for holding physical addresses |
| |
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > Are we sure resource_size_t is -never- used to represent memory ? I > though it was on some platforms....
On x86 it's optionally used to put memory in the resource tree, but if the memory is larger than can be held in resource_size_t it simply skips it. Don't know about elsewhere.
J
| |