lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [Patch] Scale pidhash_shift/pidhash_size up based on num_possible_cpus().
Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com> writes:

> Oops, confusing details. That was a different problem we had been
> tracking.

Which leads back to the original question. What were you measuring
that showed improvement with a larger pid hash size?

Almost by definition a larger hash table will perform better. However
my intuition is that we are talking about something that should be in
the noise for most workloads.

Eric


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-01 22:07    [W:0.099 / U:0.552 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site