lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.27-rc1: strange fstab issue (Re: 2.6.27-rc1 + selinux new options = no httpd)
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 09:47:59AM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 09:39 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Thursday 31 July 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Update by Gene below.
> > >On Thursday, 31 of July 2008, James Morris wrote:
> > >> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > >> > >Which new options?
> > >> >
> > >> > Make xconfig-->security options:
> > >> >
> > >> > XFRM Networking security hooks
> > >> >
> > >> > and several others just below it. Unforch, I can't copy/paste the
> > >> > screen.
> > >>
> > >> I can't really imagine what that is (although if you enable the secmark
> > >> controls under the main SELinux menu, which are disabled by default,
> > >> there could be problems).
> > >
> > >On a possibly related note, I've been observing a strange issue on one of
> > >my test boxes with OpenSUSE 10.3 recently. Namely, the fsck complains
> > >that there's no passno value in the fstab, although it obviously is present.
> > >
> > >Strangely enough, if the kernel is compiled with CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX
> > > unset, the fsck doesn't complain about the missing passno field any more.
> > >
> > >Thanks,
> > >Rafael
> >
> > I just did a 2.6.27-rc1 rebuild on a pure, all defaults 'make oldconfig' from
> > my 2.6.26 final .config moved to that src tree.
> >
> > httpd is still being denied access to its log files and dies during the bootup.
> >
> > This is a showstopper for me.
>
> Stephen Smalley just sent me a private note. Apparently he is having
> e-mail trouble but he did point out the most likely problem. Can you
> add the patch from
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121726661110266&w=2
>
> And give it a whirl? Sorry, but we think the problem is that the VFS
> stopped passing all of the relevant information down to the security
> system. https is only allowed to append to its log files, not actually
> 'write.' Since the VFS is longer differentiating those two operations
> you are getting then denial for write.
>
> I'll try to get this pushed into linus's tree quickly.

It's in linux-next, BTW. I'll push the next set to Linus in an hour or so.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-01 16:05    [W:1.415 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site