[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Dangerous code in cpumask_of_cpu?
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 18:54:38 Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Johannes Weiner <> writes:
> > But then, this code should probably just evaluate to m without this
> > obscure *(&m) construct.
> This, however is still possible, no?

Unfortunately this change was specifically made in the changeset I refered to,
so that the &cpumask_of_cpu() could be passed :(


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-08 11:37    [W:0.066 / U:2.704 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site