[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:07:31PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> > I still disagree with this whole patch. There is not reason to let
> > the freeze request timeout - an auto-unfreezing will only confuse the
> > hell out of the caller. The only reason where the current XFS freeze
> > call can hang and this would be theoretically useful is when the
> What happens when someone dirties so much data that vm swaps out
> whatever process that frozen the filesystem?

a) you can't dirty a frozen filesystem - by definition a frozen
filesystem is a *clean filesystem* and *cannot be dirtied*.
b) Swap doesn't write through the filesystem
c) you can still read from a frozen filesystem to page your
executableѕ in.
d) if dirtying another unfrozen filesystem swaps out your
application so it can't run, then there's a major VM bug.
Regardless, until the app completes it is relying on the
filesystem being frozen, so it better remain frozen....

> I though that was why the timeout was there...

Not that I know of.


Dave Chinner
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-09 01:13    [W:0.095 / U:3.020 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site