[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: kmap_atomic_pfn for PCI BAR access?
On Thursday 26 June 2008 13:11, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Dave Airlie wrote:

> > doing tlb flush for iounmap is slow as all hell if you do it a lot,
> > and we can't afford to mmap the whole aperture it can 1GB.
> Maybe Nick's vmap reimplementation would help here. It effectively
> allows you to map stuff into the vmalloc space, and do lazy tlb flushes
> to mitigate the cost of map/unmap. He posted the patches week or so ago.

Yeah, it can _really_ help. I'd posted some performance numbers with
the patch which might prompt you to take another look at ioremap.

One thing I still haven't implemented in that patch are CPU-local
mappings (which only require a local flush to flush)... I found that
after the improvements I did implement, they didn't help much for
my workloads, so I suspect you might find the same thing... But anyway
if you really need the per-CPU mappings, it should be possible to
implement rather generically in vmap layer.

I would be very interested to know what sort of results you see with it
(compared to kmap_atomic and compared to vanilla ioremap)


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-07 08:57    [W:0.087 / U:1.312 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site