Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.26-rc9: Reported regressions from 2.6.25 | Date | Sun, 6 Jul 2008 20:02:45 +0200 |
| |
On Sunday, 6 of July 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 07:05:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Also, in the next couple of days I'll be closing the bugs the reporters of > > which have been totally unresponsive. > >... > > If no action by us gets combined with automated weekly emails then > no responses to the latter is not an unexpected event. > > Such a submitter might be perfectly responsive to actual work on a bug > while really pissed off by getting the bug closed. > > Look e.g. at #10865 that had a 1 month gap in submitter responses, > but the actual problem is that noone of us ever bothered to look at > this Oops... > > I just did a run through all open 2.6.26-rc regressions, and I did not > find a single one where we seem to be waiting for some time for an > answer of the submitter. [1]
The following are my candidates:
10629 10786 10815 10906 (the thread has apparently died) 11009
Thanks, Rafael
| |