lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for July 29
Date
On Wednesday 30 July 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:06:50 +0200 Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > * Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> [2008-07-29 21:48]:
> > > > Isn't this the opposite end of the same problem for which Bernhard
> > > > has been repeatedly trying to find a taker for his patch:
> > > >
> > > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.kexec/1882
> > >
> > > Yes. It's not the kobject patch at fault here, it's the use of kobjects
> > > so early in the boot process. That needs to be fixed.
>
> It was a bit optimistic to stick an unconditional GFP_KERNEL allocation
> into the previously-atomic kobject_init().
>
> It's only 128 bytes, so why can't we fix both problems thusly?

Fixes the bug for me (also true for previous patch from Bernhard).

Thanks!


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-30 21:49    [W:0.057 / U:0.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site