[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: x86 tracehook

    * Roland McGrath <> wrote:

    > Hi! The generic tracehook patches were merged, so now the arch stuff
    > can go in any time. These are the pending x86 changes. The only
    > difference from what I posted before are fixing up some tiny syntax
    > nits in syscall.h that made gcc-3.x unhappy.
    > Sorry Ingo, I had already done this with git-rebase before I read your
    > admonition about that today. (Anyway, the prerequisite tracehook
    > series went in via patches rather than a GIT merge, so I don't think
    > the x86/tracehook branch forked from my own tracehook branch could
    > still have been used.)

    that's OK. It only gets painful once someone starts relying on a branch.

    > The following changes since commit 8be1a6d6c77ab4532e4476fdb8177030ef48b52c:
    > Linus Torvalds (1):
    > Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://
    > are available in the git repository at:
    > git:// x86-tracehook
    > Roland McGrath (6):
    > x86: tracehook_signal_handler
    > x86: tracehook syscall
    > x86: tracehook: asm/syscall.h
    > x86 signals: use asm/syscall.h
    > x86: tracehook: TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME
    > x86: tracehook: CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK

    pulled into tip/x86/tracehook - thanks Roland!


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-07-28 17:09    [W:0.029 / U:3.424 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site