lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: x86 tracehook

* Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi! The generic tracehook patches were merged, so now the arch stuff
> can go in any time. These are the pending x86 changes. The only
> difference from what I posted before are fixing up some tiny syntax
> nits in syscall.h that made gcc-3.x unhappy.
>
> Sorry Ingo, I had already done this with git-rebase before I read your
> admonition about that today. (Anyway, the prerequisite tracehook
> series went in via patches rather than a GIT merge, so I don't think
> the x86/tracehook branch forked from my own tracehook branch could
> still have been used.)

that's OK. It only gets painful once someone starts relying on a branch.

> The following changes since commit 8be1a6d6c77ab4532e4476fdb8177030ef48b52c:
> Linus Torvalds (1):
> Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/.../roland/infiniband
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frob/linux-2.6-utrace.git x86-tracehook
>
> Roland McGrath (6):
> x86: tracehook_signal_handler
> x86: tracehook syscall
> x86: tracehook: asm/syscall.h
> x86 signals: use asm/syscall.h
> x86: tracehook: TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME
> x86: tracehook: CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK

pulled into tip/x86/tracehook - thanks Roland!

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-28 17:09    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans