[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER [was [PATCH] x86: BUILD_IRQ say .text]
    On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 19:45 +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
    > I've Cc'ed Ben and linuxppc-dev because I wonder if they're aware
    > that several options (I got it from LATENCYTOP, but I think LOCKDEP
    > and FTRACE and some others) are doing a "select FRAME_POINTER",
    > which forces CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y on PowerPC, even though
    > FRAME_POINTER is not an option offered on PowerPC. The
    > resulting kernels appear to run okay, but I was surprised.

    Because the option just does nothing for us ? :-) We always have frame
    pointers on powerpc except in some case for leaf functions. I don't know
    if the option has any actual effect on the later, but I don't think we
    have a case where doing either way would break things.


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-07-25 23:49    [W:0.018 / U:86.132 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site