Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:28:26 -0700 | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Subject | Re: [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Delayed interrupt work, thread pools |
| |
James Bottomley wrote: > Easier to implement, yes. Easier to program, unlikely, and coming with > a large amount of overhead, definitely. > >> BTW, if something like this is implemented, I think that it should be a >> replacement for softirqs and tasklets. > under the "better steal right (from other open source) than invent wrong" mantra: it's worth looking at what glib does here; I've used their threadpools before and it worked really well for me.... we could learn a lot from that
| |