Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:46:30 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [patch -mmotm 2/6] fix qla2xxx-use-memory_read_from_buffer.patch |
| |
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:44:16 -0700 Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Akinobu Mita wrote: > > > > > > > Now memory_read_from_buffer() belongs in string.h > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> > > > > Cc: Andrew Vasquez <linux-driver@qlogic.com> > > > > Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> > > > > Cc: Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com> > > > > Cc: Seokmann Ju <seokmann.ju@qlogic.com> > > > > > > If needed: > > > > > > Acked-by: Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com> > > > > Thanks. So we now have tested-by:you and acked-by:you. That'll do ;) > > > > > BTW: is the memory_read_from_buffer() work for qla2xxx going in > > > through the mm tree submission path??? > > > > FSVO "through", yeah. It's appeared on linux-scsi four times so far. > > Last time James complained about the fs.h inclusion so Akinobu raised a > > patch "move memory_read_from_buffer() from fs.h to string.h" which I > > just merged. > > > > I'll just keep pressing send - it'll get there sometime. Or you can > > merge it if you like. > > Would it too bothersome if I were to just collapse the two patches and > submit the composite with the my next set of patches??? Seems silly > to add the oneliner to the history...
Sure, no probs.
| |