Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:34:59 +0800 | From | Herbert Xu <> | Subject | Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000000000000e (reset_prng_context) |
| |
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 09:51:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > And I agree with me. I fail to see how someone who is familiar with > kernel code and who is reviewing a submission could let something like > > for (i=DEFAULT_BLK_SZ-1;i>0;i--) { > > pass without comment.
Well here is the code in question in its entirety:
/* * Now update our DT value */ for (i=DEFAULT_BLK_SZ-1;i>0;i--) { ctx->DT[i] = ctx->DT[i-1]; }
I'm afraid that I simply don't see your point.
> btw, I've searched my linux-kernel archives and netdev archives and the > linux-crypto web archives and can find no sign of any submission or > discussion of this patch. Am I looking in the wrong places?
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org/msg02082.html
Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
| |