Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:39:10 -0700 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: [stable] Linux 2.6.25.10 |
| |
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:28:44PM +0200, pageexec@freemail.hu wrote: > Ted, the discussion is *not* about what the best disclosure policy > would be for the kernel. the problem i raised was that there's one > declared policy in Documentation/SecurityBugs (full disclosure) yet > actual actions are completely different and now Linus even admitted > it.
Huh?
How does what is described there differ from what Linus said, or the -stable team has been doing so far?
What specifically are you asking for that is different?
The -stable commits are exactly the same as they are in mainline (Linus's tree). Are you upset by the fact that I am not saying, "Hey, look, here's a bugfix that might be security related and here's how to reproduce it!" in big flashing letters?
thanks,
greg k-h
| |