Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 13 Jul 2008 15:20:05 -0700 | From | "Yinghai Lu" <> | Subject | Re: per-cpu related? |
| |
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > > * Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: >> > >> > * Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> thanks >> >> >> >> could be caused by max_low_pfn_mapped patch...because hpet still use >> >> fixmap address that is cleared by others. >> >> still got >> >> calling __stack_chk_test+0x0/0x89 >> Testing -fstack-protector-all feature >> -fstack-protector-all test failed >> ------------[ cut here ]------------ >> WARNING: at kernel/panic.c:393 __stack_chk_test+0x61/0x89() >> Modules linked in: >> Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.26-rc9-tip-01873-ga9827e7-dirty #359 >> >> Call Trace: >> [<ffffffff8026615e>] warn_on_slowpath+0x6c/0xa7 >> [<ffffffff80266199>] ? __stack_chk_test+0x0/0x89 >> [<ffffffff80266199>] ? __stack_chk_test+0x0/0x89 >> [<ffffffff8022a4f4>] ? mcount_call+0x5/0x31 >> [<ffffffff80266199>] ? __stack_chk_test+0x0/0x89 >> [<ffffffff802661fa>] __stack_chk_test+0x61/0x89 >> [<ffffffff80e729e4>] kernel_init+0x1de/0x346 >> [<ffffffff8022a4f4>] ? mcount_call+0x5/0x31 >> [<ffffffff80262df7>] ? finish_task_switch+0x14/0xe3 >> [<ffffffff8022b589>] child_rip+0xa/0x11 >> [<ffffffff80e72806>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x346 >> [<ffffffff8022b57f>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x11 >> >> ---[ end trace 0f276ea63a4e83de ]--- > > please try latest tip/master - the self-test had to be removed. (gcc > will treat the stackprotector-failure function as ((noreturn)) attribute > and will optimize out the return path, making a reliable self-test > impossible in the way we tried to) > ok, you fixed it... that warning is gone.
YH
| |