lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: per-cpu related?

* Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >
> > * Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> thanks
> >>
> >> could be caused by max_low_pfn_mapped patch...because hpet still use
> >> fixmap address that is cleared by others.
>
> still got
>
> calling __stack_chk_test+0x0/0x89
> Testing -fstack-protector-all feature
> -fstack-protector-all test failed
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: at kernel/panic.c:393 __stack_chk_test+0x61/0x89()
> Modules linked in:
> Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.26-rc9-tip-01873-ga9827e7-dirty #359
>
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff8026615e>] warn_on_slowpath+0x6c/0xa7
> [<ffffffff80266199>] ? __stack_chk_test+0x0/0x89
> [<ffffffff80266199>] ? __stack_chk_test+0x0/0x89
> [<ffffffff8022a4f4>] ? mcount_call+0x5/0x31
> [<ffffffff80266199>] ? __stack_chk_test+0x0/0x89
> [<ffffffff802661fa>] __stack_chk_test+0x61/0x89
> [<ffffffff80e729e4>] kernel_init+0x1de/0x346
> [<ffffffff8022a4f4>] ? mcount_call+0x5/0x31
> [<ffffffff80262df7>] ? finish_task_switch+0x14/0xe3
> [<ffffffff8022b589>] child_rip+0xa/0x11
> [<ffffffff80e72806>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x346
> [<ffffffff8022b57f>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x11
>
> ---[ end trace 0f276ea63a4e83de ]---

please try latest tip/master - the self-test had to be removed. (gcc
will treat the stackprotector-failure function as ((noreturn)) attribute
and will optimize out the return path, making a reliable self-test
impossible in the way we tried to)

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-13 23:07    [W:0.053 / U:0.448 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site