lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jul]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: inux-next: Tree for July 1
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> On Tuesday, 1 of July 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since next-20080630:
> >
> > New tree: ttydev - unfortunately it had to be reverted because of build
> > failures after lots of conflict resolution (which may have caused the
> > build failures).
> >
> > Changed tree: the cris tree changed branch names.
> >
> > The sched tree gained a couple of conflicts against the ftrace and
> > cpus4096 trees.
> >
> > The pci tree gained a conflict against the x86 tree.
> >
> > The usb tree reverted due to a build failure after merging with the pci
> > tree was changed for a fixup patch.
> >
> > The v4l-dvb tree lost its three conflicts against Linus' tree.
> >
> > The s390 tree gained a conflict against the diver-core tree.
> >
> > The ide tree fixed its build problems.
> >
> > The nfsd tree lost a conflict against the nfs tree.
> >
> > The powerpc tree gained a conflict against the ide tree.
> >
> > The net tree gained two conflicts against the powerpc tree.
> >
> > The galak tree lost its conflict against the net tree.
> >
> > the blk-removal tree gained a conflict against the s390 tree.
> >
> > The firmware tree lost several conflicts against the net tree so didn't
> > need a commit reverted any more.
> >
> > Merging the ttydev tree got several conflicts against the usb and
> > firmware trees. Unfortunately, it also would not build and so was
> > reverted.
> >
> > I have also applied the following patches for know problems:
> > module: fix NULL pointer dereference in find_symbol()
>
> I can't mount NFS shares with this kernel. I get something of this sort in
> dmesg and it seems to be 100% reproducible:
>
> [ 314.058858] RPC: Registered udp transport module.
> [ 314.058863] RPC: Registered tcp transport module.
> [ 314.490970] RPC: transport (0) not supported
> [ 319.246987] __ratelimit: 23 messages suppressed
>
> linux-next from yesterday was fine with the same .config .

Same problem for me. Thanks for reporting it.
I wondered if it was something that I did wrong...

--
~Randy


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-01 22:53    [W:0.233 / U:0.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site