Messages in this thread | | | From | OGAWA Hirofumi <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/7] fat: Fix VFAT_IOCTL_READDIR_xxx and cleanup for userland | Date | Tue, 01 Jul 2008 22:15:30 +0900 |
| |
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> writes:
>> #include <linux/magic.h> >> +#include <asm/byteorder.h> > > Why do we need this in the user-visible part of the header?
It was just moved from line below of this.
>> +struct __fat_dirent { >> + long d_ino; >> + __kernel_off_t d_off; >> + unsigned short d_reclen; >> + char d_name[256]; /* We must not include limits.h! */ >> +}; > > Any reason this is not called fat_dirent?
It was suggested, and I thought it's safe. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
| |