[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH -mm 04/25] free swap space on swap-in/activation
Hi Kim-san,

>> - Can completely optimise the thing away if !CONFIG_SWAP.
> I think we can optimize more and more in case of if !CONFIG_SWAP.
> If system are !CONFIG_SWAP, we can never swap out anonymous pages.
> Don't we manage anonymous pages with list ?
> Such system don't need to insert anonymous pages into lru list when fault occur.
> It is just needless overhead.
> Also, If we can't reclaim anonymous pages, don't we need anon rmap facility ?
> I don't know well which subsystems used rmap.
> If pageout only use anonymous rmap for pageout,
> we can remove anonymous rmapping code in case of !CONFIG_SWAP

You are right.
but I think rmap isn't bottle neck in embedded system.
Why do you want remove that?

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-06-09 15:41    [W:0.078 / U:1.316 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site