lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for June 5

* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> > > did SLUB change in linux-next? There is no such problem in -tip.
> >
> > i just successfully booted your config on 4 separate 64-bit
> > test-systems with latest -tip. (two dual-core boxes, a quad and a
> > 16way box) Latest -tip includes sched-next and x86-next as well.
>
> What's the point in testing a radically differenet kernel from the one
> which is known to be crashing?

well, you Cc:-ed me, so i wanted to exclude -tip's 750+ commits in this
area (scheduling, 64-bit x86) in the first step.

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-06-06 09:45    [W:0.328 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site