Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 6 Jun 2008 09:41:37 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for June 5 |
| |
* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > did SLUB change in linux-next? There is no such problem in -tip. > > > > i just successfully booted your config on 4 separate 64-bit > > test-systems with latest -tip. (two dual-core boxes, a quad and a > > 16way box) Latest -tip includes sched-next and x86-next as well. > > What's the point in testing a radically differenet kernel from the one > which is known to be crashing?
well, you Cc:-ed me, so i wanted to exclude -tip's 750+ commits in this area (scheduling, 64-bit x86) in the first step.
Ingo
| |