Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:23:26 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for June 5 |
| |
* Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> AFAICS this is not yet required for v2.6.26, as the requirement to > >> never iterate to MAX_NUMNODES and call nr_cpus_node() with the > >> index only got introduced by Mike's patch. > > > > the one below is needed as well i think. > > Yeah. I think you had better take Mike's patches, I don't trust even > that my patch and your fixlet does everything correctly.
yep, just discovered that we had them already ;-)
Thomas has just scripted up a new "detect if a commit is not in linux-next yet" script that should avoid such problems in the future.
your second patch is still wanted, it would have detected the problem earlier.
Ingo
| |