Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:13:58 +0200 | From | "Vegard Nossum" <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for June 5 |
| |
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > >> > Subject: [PATCH] sched: don't call node_to_cpumask() on nodes > >> > nr_node_ids >> >> AFAICS this is not yet required for v2.6.26, as the requirement to >> never iterate to MAX_NUMNODES and call nr_cpus_node() with the index >> only got introduced by Mike's patch. > > the one below is needed as well i think.
Yeah. I think you had better take Mike's patches, I don't trust even that my patch and your fixlet does everything correctly.
Vegard
-- "The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation." -- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
| |