[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [BUG] Linux task_struct leak
    On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 12:40:07AM +0200, Thorsten Knabe wrote:
    > I can start other 32-bit applications, for example compile an UML
    > kernel, within the chroot without leaking task_structs, but as soon as I
    > start an UML instance, I see leaked task_structs. Starting and
    > immediately shutting down an UML instacne leaks approximately 2000
    > task_structs. The number of leaked task_structs on the host seems to be
    > equal to the number of processes that have been created (and destroyed)
    > within the UML instances.

    I misunderstood - I thought you were seeing a task_struct leak within
    UML rather than a leak on the host elicited by UML.

    > As far as I understand the UML code in the kernel, an UML kernel uses
    > some unusual clone() flags when creating new processes, which are seldom
    > used by other applications and could be related to the bug.

    Yes, it does. I don't see the flags causing a leak, though. What
    might be more likely (although I really have no idea) is ptrace.
    Possibly a reference is held when it should have been dropped. This
    might also show up with strace or gdb.


    Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-06-05 02:53    [W:0.025 / U:0.920 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site