Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:00:00 -0400 | From | Mark Hounschell <> | Subject | Re: Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option? (may have realtime uses) |
| |
Paul Jackson wrote: > Mark wrote: >> What is an abonination, is that cpusets are equired for this type of >> isolation to begin with, even on a 2 processor machine. > > Just to be sure I'm following you here, you stating that you > want to be able to manipulate the isolated cpu map at runtime, > not just with the boot option isolcpus, right? > Where this > isolated cpu map works just fine even on systems which do > not have cpusets configured, right? >
Yes to both questions. However after reading Max and Peter's response, I guess there is another, probably better or _only_, way to get what I really need anyway so please don't consider my intrusion into this thread as a NAK.
I do not rely on this option as it is implemented.
Regards Mark
| |