Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:34:16 +0200 | From | "Michael Kerrisk" <> | Subject | Re: [patch 0/4 v2] vfs: fix utimensat() non-conformances to spec |
| |
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote: >> This patch series is a revised version of the patch series >> that I sent yesterday to fix various utimensat() >> non-conformances. Patches 1 and 2 are unchanged (and were >> Acked by Miklos); patches 3 and 4 are revised following >> comments by Miklos. >> >> As requested I've split the original patch >> ("utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v4] (patch)"; >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.file-systems/24325 ) >> into four parts. Ideally, these should be applied for >> 2.6.26-rc, for the reasons outlined in my earlier mail >> "utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v4] (test results)", >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/689411/ . >> >> The four patches can be applied independently, except that >> patch 3 needs patch 2 to be applied first. > > ACK for all four patches. > > In patch 3/4 the indentation of that big "if" looks really horribly > broken, but it will be cleaned out completely, so I won't complain...
Aargh -- true, I messed up the indentation!
-- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html
| |