lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] IB/uverbs: BKL is not needed for ib_uverbs_open()
Date
 > That's the general idea: audit the code where the BKL appears and
> remove it when it's safe to do so. It's always an appropriate time;
> the only question is whether you think this change is good to go into
> the tree for 2.6.27, or whether it should hang out in linux-next for
> one more cycle. I would assume that the extra time would not be
> necessary.

Yes, this change should be good to go for 2.6.27.

Thanks,
Roland


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-07-01 02:19    [W:0.053 / U:0.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site