[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Future Linux on Bistable Storage
> the alternate technologies that I have heard about are either _far_ less
> dense then DRAM (similar to static ram) or require erasing in blocks
> (similar to flash).

I will agree with this.

> niether one is appropriate for a large, flat addressed
> memory architecture as you list below.

I don't agree with this one. Erase blocks don't automatically
disqualify a memory as a fit into a flat addressed arch. You need to
play games at the memory management layer to make it work, but it's
not impossible.

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-06-04 03:17    [W:0.087 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site