[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 09/10] netns: Enable tagging for net_class directories in sysfs
    On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 05:24:21PM +0200, Benjamin Thery wrote:
    > Greg KH wrote:
    >> On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 03:46:08PM +0200, Benjamin Thery wrote:
    >>> net: Enable tagging for net_class directories in sysfs
    >>> The problem. Network devices show up in sysfs and with the network
    >>> namespace active multiple devices with the same name can show up in
    >>> the same directory, ouch!
    >>> To avoid that problem and allow existing applications in network
    >>> namespaces
    >>> to see the same interface that is currently presented in sysfs, this
    >>> patch enables the tagging directory support in sysfs.
    >>> By using the network namespace pointers as tags to separate out the
    >>> the sysfs directory entries we ensure that we don't have conflicts
    >>> in the directories and applications only see a limited set of
    >>> the network devices.
    >> I don't like it how the network subsystem is starting to leach into the
    >> sysfs core here. What happens when the next subsystem wants to do the
    >> same thing? And then the next one? Will they all have to do this kind
    >> of intrusive changes to sysfs?
    > >
    > > Can't this be done only in the network subsystem?
    > I'm not sure to understand exactly what you mean.
    > What you don't like is seeing these hunks of network code in
    > fs/sysfs/mount.c? And you prefer to see these bits of code resides in
    > the network subsystem instead and see only "generic" sysfs services in
    > fs/sysfs/mount.c?

    Yes, exactly.

    I don't want the problem that if more subsystems want to implement
    something like this, they too need to modify the sysfs core.

    And the mess with the #ifdef, that's not nice either :)

    > If this is it, I have some idea to implement a less intrusive
    > sysfs_net_exit(), which can be shared with the other namespaces.
    > Serge introduces the same kind of changes in patch 10 to fix an issue in
    > user namespace. I think we can share a bit of code and move the parts
    > specific to each namespace in their own subsystems.

    I think that would be a good idea. Care to redo the series?


    greg k-h

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-06-03 18:39    [W:0.022 / U:3.500 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site