Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:30:07 -0700 (PDT) | Subject | Re: [3/10 PATCH] inline wake_up_bit | From | David Miller <> |
| |
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:17:40 +0200
> And you know what? This is likely not the end yet! It's possible > spin_lock_irqXXX, __wake_up_common, waitqueue_active or bit_waitqueue > are inlines - I didn't check.
The thing to do in these kinds of scenerios is to provide top-level routes in kernel/sched.c where all the inlining occurs, rather than doing it in header files and thus expanding this stuff in multiple places.
| |