Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:26:28 +0200 | From | "Vegard Nossum" <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for June 23 |
| |
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Testing tracer sched_switch: PASSED >>> Testing tracer sysprof: PASSED >>> Testing tracer ftrace: PASSED >>> Testing dynamic ftrace: PASSED >>> Testing tracer irqsoff: PASSED >>> Testing tracer preemptoff: PASSED >>> Testing tracer preemptirqsoff: <4>------------[ cut here ]------------ >>> WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2680 check_flags+0x142/0x160() >>> Pid: 2, comm: kthreadd Not tainted 2.6.26-rc6-next-20080620 #34 >> >> <-- Oops, wrong version :-( >> >> Will try the latest one as well. > > Okay, I can confirm that this happens with today's tree too. I also > get this (new) warning: > > mm/slub.c: In function 'kmem_cache_defrag': > mm/slub.c:3046: warning: 'reclaimed' may be used uninitialized in this function > > Otherwise things seem to work good :-)
In fact, I got this stacktrace when I shut down (but I was in a hurry so I didn't have the time to really investigate it):
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/vegard/kernels/20080623-next/DSCF3014.JPG
$ addr2line -e vmlinux -i c01fd0c1 fs/sysfs/dir.c:380
And additionally, the next two boots hung here (but the third one was okay):
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/vegard/kernels/20080623-next/DSCF3015.JPG
I don't know what these issues are related too. I can try debug_initcall for the hang.
Vegard
-- "The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation." -- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
| |