[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC PATCHES] Re: Is configfs the right solution for configuration based fs?
    On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 04:19:10PM +1000, Ben Nizette wrote:
    > Looks great, thx :-). I'll convert some of my stuff over to this
    > interface and see how it flies in the real world.

    Excellent. What is your stuff, btw? Got code? Love to see it.

    > ISTR when I did this I kept the old semantics and used ERR_PTR and
    > friends if things went pear-shaped. Given the small number of in-tree
    > users needing to be moved over, a more intrusive change for the sake of
    > a cleaner API like you've done is probably a good thing anyway :-)

    Yeah, I like this better than ERR_PTR.
    If you like the macros, I'll try to make the next merge window
    as well. So let me know.



    "I almost ran over an angel
    He had a nice big fat cigar.
    'In a sense,' he said, 'You're alone here
    So if you jump, you'd best jump far.'"

    Joel Becker
    Principal Software Developer
    Phone: (650) 506-8127

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-06-20 09:01    [W:0.021 / U:8.512 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site