Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 2 Jun 2008 13:13:39 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot transaction abstraction |
| |
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
> + /* Get the current pte state, but zero it out to make it > + non-present, preventing the hardware from asynchronously > + updating it. */
please use standard and consistent comment style, similar to:
> +/* > + * Start a pte protection read-modify-write transaction, which > + * protects against asynchronous hardware modifications to the pte. > + * The intention is not to prevent the hardware from making pte > + * updates, but to prevent any updates it may make from being lost.
Ingo
| |