[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: architectures with ARCH_SUPPORTS_AOUT but no binfmt_aout
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 01:29:09PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 14:23 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > Sorting these alphabetically will result in less merge conflicts when
> > the list grows.
> Maybe, but it doesn't grow that fast -- and it's small enough that if I
> add stuff in the middle, the context will cover the whole thing and
> cause a merge conflict either way. And it isn't in alphabetical order
> now either :)
I know and I know.
If someone did the janitorial effort and converted all the
per-arch defined symbols to one single definiton
and select the list would grow rapidly.


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-06-17 14:39    [W:0.066 / U:3.464 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site