Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 15 Jun 2008 09:50:23 +0200 | | From | Németh Márton <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] 8139too: clean up spaces and TABs |
| |
Stefan Richter wrote: > Németh Márton wrote: >> From: Márton Németh <nm127@freemail.hu> >> >> Clean up the following errors and warnings reported by checkpatch.pl: > > Is 8139too in active development or are there people actively fixing > current bugs in it? If not, a whitespace cleanup may be considered a > waste of time. There are even a few valid arguments that such changes > are harmful then. > >> - space prohibited between function name and open parenthesis '(' >> - space required before the open brace '{' >> - code indent should use tabs where possible >> - line over 80 characters >> - spaces required around that '=' (ctx:VxW) > > Did you check that your whitespace changes are indeed only whitespace > changes, i.e. that resulting assembler is unchanged? If you checked it, > it's worth mentioning in the submission.
Yes, I checked this. When I compared the "objdump -d" output I found that only the function calls are changed where the __LINE__ is a parameter.
Sorry about taking your time. My intention was to make the 8139too source code better as I am using this driver actively to communicate with the digital world. I have chosen the checkpatch.pl's output to compare the whether the old and the new code are better or not. Maybe that was a mistake.
I would like to try it again, but in a different way. I collected here the different problems reported by checkpatch.pl. I divided it to two groups according to your comments which I think it worth to deal with:
+ ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parenthesis + WARNING: __func__ should be used instead of gcc specific __FUNCTION__ + WARNING: plain inline is preferred over __inline__ + WARNING: Use #include <linux/io.h> instead of <asm/io.h> + WARNING: Use #include <linux/uaccess.h> instead of <asm/uaccess.h>
and the second group which it seems that may hurt somebody:
- ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible - ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV) - ERROR: space required before the open brace '{' - ERROR: space required before the open parenthesis '(' - ERROR: spaces required around that '=' (ctx:VxW) - ERROR: trailing statements should be on next line - WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks - WARNING: do not add new typedefs - WARNING: line over 80 characters - WARNING: space prohibited between function name and open parenthesis '('
This is a much smaller set of changes. What do you think?
Regards,
Márton Németh
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |