Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 14 Jun 2008 02:39:16 -0700 | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Subject | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| |
On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:16:56 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > ok, should we then remove that warning, if it's spurious? > kerneloops.org has picked up a few other instances of this warning as > well: > > http://www.kerneloops.org/searchfile.php?search=net%2Fsched%2Fsch_generic.c&btnG=Filename+Search
the interesting thing is that there is a clear bias on which drivers are tripping this (r8169 is top when I counted yesterday, with sis900 second and then a long tail of nothing) that I think the WARN_ON() is useful in addition to the always-there printk. Eg it does help in seeing which driver is most likely to trigger this. (Andrew also thought this would trigger a *LOT*, so far it's only a rather modest amount, but it's waiting for Fedora or others to ship a kernel with this in to be sure)
-- If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org
| |