Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:30:07 -0400 | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH -mm 11/24] pageflag helpers for configed-out flags |
| |
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:23:47 -0400 Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 16:08 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:01:45 -0700 > > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:42:25 -0400 > > > Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Define proper false/noop inline functions for noreclaim page > > > > flags when !defined(CONFIG_NORECLAIM_LRU) > > > > > > I changed that to CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU. > > > > > > Did we agree that the presence of this config variable is undesirable? > > > If so, what's involved in making it go away? > > > > We agreed that having CONFIG_NORELAIM_SWAP was bad, that one went away. > > That was CONFIG_NORELAIM_MLOCK, right?
You're right.
> Which reminds me: we'll need to change the description of > CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU to state that it uses 2 page flags if, indeed, we > want to say anything about page flag usage in the Kconfig help text. > Not sure that's helpful.
True, we might as well remove that comment.
-- All rights reversed.
| |