lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH -mm 11/24] pageflag helpers for configed-out flags
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:23:47 -0400
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 16:08 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:01:45 -0700
> > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:42:25 -0400
> > > Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Define proper false/noop inline functions for noreclaim page
> > > > flags when !defined(CONFIG_NORECLAIM_LRU)
> > >
> > > I changed that to CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU.
> > >
> > > Did we agree that the presence of this config variable is undesirable?
> > > If so, what's involved in making it go away?
> >
> > We agreed that having CONFIG_NORELAIM_SWAP was bad, that one went away.
>
> That was CONFIG_NORELAIM_MLOCK, right?

You're right.

> Which reminds me: we'll need to change the description of
> CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU to state that it uses 2 page flags if, indeed, we
> want to say anything about page flag usage in the Kconfig help text.
> Not sure that's helpful.

True, we might as well remove that comment.

--
All rights reversed.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-06-11 22:35    [W:0.045 / U:2.956 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site