lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/6] ext4: tighten restrictions on inode flags
2008/6/11 Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>:
>> +/* Mask out flags that are inappropriate for the given type of inode. */
>> +static inline __le32 ext4_mask_flags(__le16 mode, __le32 flags)
>> +{
>> + if (S_ISDIR(mode))
>> + return flags;
>> + else if (S_ISREG(mode))
>> + return flags & ~EXT4_REG_FLMASK;
>> + else
>> + return flags & ~EXT4_OTHER_FLMASK;
>> +}
>> +
>
> why are the arguments __le32 ? They should be in host order.
>
> static inline __u32 ext4_mask_flags(umode_t mode, __u32 flags)

Whoops, I was matching the fields in ex4_inode, but I should have been
looking at ext4_inode_info. Shouldn't sparse have complained about
that?

Thanks,
Duane.

--
"I never could learn to drink that blood and call it wine" - Bob Dylan


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-06-11 13:53    [W:1.120 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site